Books & Reading · Story & Characters · Writing Insight

The Complete “Guardian” Trilogy


About The Guardian Trilogy:
The Guardian Trilogy delves into the harrowing trials of Alexander Croft, a security guard and seemingly average 30-something-year-old man, whose life is forever changed in a violent instant. After being accused of a series of heinous crimes he didn’t commit, Alex is sentenced to life in a hellish prison.

Or so his fate seems.

Because unbeknownst to him, Alex is no ordinary man. He is a Voror, a magically-gifted being commissioned with the protection of the Realms – and nothing can keep him from his true destiny.

In The Guardian Trilogy, follow Alex’s life-changing and life-challenging journey, from his training at the Voror Council in the least-admired Task of all, to a chance at love and romance with a woman whose people have wronged him, to his encounters with an enemy who has stalked him since birth, to his personal mission to clear his family name and protect the Realms from encroaching darkness. As evil rises, Alex must stand to meet it or watch everyone he has grown to love be destroyed.

Books in The Guardian Trilogy:

Book One: The Guardian

Description: Ever since Alex Croft was little, robed beings have shadowed his every move. But after he is wrongfully incarcerated, the robed strangers have apparently abandoned him. Or so it seems. When Alex’s true identity is revealed, he enters a world he has always seen but never really known. A realm where he learns how to protect the innocent from an evil that desires to control everything in its path. Especially Alex. As he trains as an apprentice within the Voror Council, Alex uncovers a sinister secret seeking to destroy him. To save himself and others, he will have to endure the same darkness he sought to escape. In this first installment of The Guardian Trilogy, Alex Croft will not only learn magic-infused Words and make strange, new allies but also discover the truth about himself and his past. A truth that will become either his destiny or his downfall.

Direct Link (Paperback): http://goo.gl/ORdSCm
Direct Link (Kindle): http://goo.gl/NjdoXq

Book Two: The Guardian Prophecy

Description: Handler Apprentice Alex Croft is invited by Sunniva, the Council’s Head Healer, to accompany her on a journey across the Realms as she seeks out an exiled Voror. Along the way, Alex encounters old friends, new enemies, and discovers a growing attraction to the hauntingly beautiful Niobe of Ryncheon. Yet the threat of Belial of Rastaban’s forces shadows their every move as they race to uncover a truth that many have desired to conceal – a truth Rastaban has killed for in order to obtain. Past grievances come to seek vengeance as Rastaban’s rebels seek to set up their own regime. And the only way Alex can hope to stop them is to make the ultimate sacrifice. In this second installment of The Guardian Trilogy, Alex Croft learns what it means to fulfill his destiny as a Guardian, which may cost him everything.

Direct Link (Paperback): http://goo.gl/5fzUU2
Direct Link (Kindle): http://goo.gl/ktwiWG


Book Three:
The Guardian Wars

Description: After miraculously surviving torture at Rastaban’s hands, Handler Alex of Croft knows the hour grows short as war among the Realms draws closer. Mustering his friends and unexpected allies, Alex assumes the role of the prophesied Halcyon and decides to cut off his enemy at the place where it all began, the infamous prison Erebus and home to the Gates of the Dead. The Guardian Wars concludes Alex of Croft’s  journey as a man of divided bloods.  But can he be a shining light in a dark place or will the darkness finally consume him?

Direct Link (Paperback): goo.gl/Ofv4Vn
Direct Link (Kindle): goo.gl/rkbsFD

Background on The Guardian Trilogy
The Guardian Trilogy is project over a decade in the making and started with a rather odd mash-up of ideas. As the author puts it, One summer, I was reading the “Harry Potter” novels and watching reruns of the Fox drama series “Prison Break.” The two stories merged in my mind as I thought, “What if Michael Scofield [chief protagonist on “Prison Break”] was a wizard?” That sparked a mental chain reaction and I had to write it out. Eventually, it evolved into The Guardian Trilogy.

Thus, The Guardian Trilogy is a fantasy series that hopes to pay respects to classic hero quest epics while remaining an entirely original piece, chiefly through the introduction of the Vorors, a magically-gifted race charged with protecting the Realms, and the Sangres, a vampiric people who are siblings to the Vorors. Both worlds collide with Alex Croft caught in the middle.

Advertisements
Book Review · Books & Reading · Story & Characters

Book Review – “The Berenstain Bears”


Today’s post is going to be a nostalgia fest for me as I travel down memory lane with one of my favorite childhood book series, The Berenstain Bears!

First, some quick history about the series: the Berenstain Bears were the creation of Stan and Jan Berenstain, which was later carried on by their son, Mike Berenstain. The first Berenstain Bears book, The Big Honey Hunt, was published in 1962 and introduced young readers and their families to the lovable Bear Family: Papa Bear, Mama Pear, Brother Bear (originally named Small Bear), Sister Bear, and eventually Honey Bear who all live in a large tree in Bear Country alongside family and friends. This children’s literary franchise is expansive, to say the least, as it also encompasses chapter books for older readers, a television series, a stage play, toys, and video games.

A typical Berenstain Bears story adhered to the following formula: at least one member of the Bear Family faces a dilemma and is given advice on how to handle it so there is a lesson to be learned. Most of the books’ messages fell into one of two camps: moral messages (i.e. do the right thing, be fair, learn to share, etc.) and safety/health/personal well-being messages (don’t talk to strangers, don’t do drugs, don’t follow the crowd, etc.). As expected, there are critics who condemn the series for being too formulaic, preachy, and saccharine. And while every reader has a right to his or her own opinion, I personally disagree with the criticism.

First, children’s literature – especially for young readers graduating from simple picture books – is formulaic for a reason as it makes the story easier for children to follow along rather than offer a complex plot. Secondly, children’s books’ morals are often overt by telling rather than showing. This is perfectly appropriate for a young audience who isn’t mature enough to detect subtle meanings that show rather than tell. Lastly, there is a difference between a story being warm and charming and one that’s syrupy sweet. The former possesses an inviting tone that welcomes readers in while the latter talks down to, and inadvertently insults, its audience. In my view, the Berenstain Bears books avoid this by making their messages relatable for children in showing how conflicts, combined with the right advice and an application of wisdom, can be resolved.

With that little sidebar out of the way, you can probably tell I have always loved the Berenstain Bears! 😀

Given that this series encompasses a ton of books, I’m only going to highlight some of my favorites out of the 50+ volumes I own. (I tried to organize this list from my most favorite first and so on.)

So sit back and enjoy this trip down memory lane!


The Berenstain Bears Learn about Strangers
(1985)
This was one of the first Berenstain Bears books I ever read and I also own a copy of the television episode on VHS. I appreciate how it tackles the topic of strangers without intentionally scaring kids. Granted, that’s Papa Bear’s tactic but Mama Bear takes a different approach by comparing strangers to apples. Some strangers might not look nice on the outside but on the inside they’re perfectly fine, but there are other people who might look good on the outside though on the inside aren’t so good after all. Hence, children need to be perceptive – but not paranoid – because of the few “bad apples” out in the world. This is one of several books in the series to focus on an “appearances can be deceiving” theme, and I think it’s a good one to teach kids as being able to discern the actions and intents of others is one of the stepping stones to developing strong critical thinking skills.


The Berenstain Bears Get Stage Fright (1986)
This brings back memories of when I was in a church children’s choir and participated in their annual Christmas musicals. In my very first one, I was approached by one of the directors at the last minute to fill in for a minor speaking role (the original performer was sick). I agreed and, after that, I usually tried out for some kind of part. My last role was one of the three leads (which included a solo!) and it was very exciting. While I didn’t get as nervous as Sister Bear does, I can certainly relate to the pre-performance jitters. Overall, this was a fun story and the ways Brother Bear teases Sister Bea for her nerves cracked me up – not to mention that, despite his bravado, he, too, isn’t immune to stage fright.


The Berenstain Bears and the Week at Grandma’s
(1986)
I love the illustrations of Grandma and Grandpa’s house, especially the stained glass touches, as it makes it feel like a warm, realistic home. This is a sweet story about how sometimes a change of scenery is good for children (as well as you never know what someone older than you might know unless you ask them). I like how Brother and Sister initially have misgivings about spending a week at their grandparents’ home by mentally comparing everything there to the amenities they normally have. But they eventually warm up to their new surroundings. While I, unfortunately, never lived close enough to my grandparents to be able to spend a weekend with them, I did enjoy their visits with my family and of our trips to visit them.


The Berenstain Bears and the Bad Dream (1988)
Gotta love Brother Bear and his obsession with all things Space Grizzlies! Re-reading it now makes me imagine that he’d fit right in with today’s superhero craze. (Can somebody say fan boy?) I’ve always been impressed over how this story explains, in a basic way for children, what dreams are and how what we see, hear, and engage on a daily basis can actually influence what we dream. The best parts are when the cubs’ dreams are analyzed in a way that children can see how their own dreams contain rather mundane elements that, when churned together, create a strange combination that isn’t worth getting scared by.


The Berenstain Bears Go to School
(1978)
This book always seemed to calm my nerves when it was time for me to start a new grade during my early years at elementary school. It’s a great encouragement to little ones who, much like Sister in the story, are starting school for the very first time. I think it does a good job of making school seem not so intimidating and, instead, depicts it as a place where learning can be fun. The adults in Sister’s life also are very supportive and help her take baby steps into this new venture in her life. Overall, this was one book in the series that always stood out to me.


The Berenstain Bears Meet Santa Bear
(1984)
This book captures everything I loved (and still love!) about Christmas. From decorating, to visiting Santa, to buying presents for family, to finally the Big Day, this book still puts a smile on my face. The illustrations are nicely done, and while the book doesn’t present a Christian message, it still encourages children to not be greedy and to take time to slow down and savor the fun moments of the Christmas season.


The Berenstain Bears and the Drug-Free Zone
(1993)
This is one of two Berenstain Bears Big Chapter Books I have (along with The Berenstain Bears and the Nerdy Nephew). Unlike the picture books, this one was longer with chapters (naturally) and had black and white (not color) illustrations. The plot involves a rumor of drugs coming into Bear Country. Brother, Sister, and some of their friends end up trying to solve a mystery where things and certain persons aren’t always what they seem (albeit they do so on their own without the help of police, which is a point some parents might want to be aware of). For kids, it does a good job teaching the “appearances can be deceiving” lesson that the series often tackled as well as a cautionary tale about drugs. It also offered a mystery plot, which was something I hadn’t seen the series do up to that point. Overall, I liked this as a lengthy (for my age at the time) read that, despite its subject matter, never got too dark.


The Berenstain Bears and Too Much Vacation
(1989)
This one never failed to crack me up. Story-wise, it’s just like how Clark Griswold (from the National Lampoon Vacation movies) would always plan for the “perfect” vacation/holiday and nothing turned out as he planned or hoped. Yet all the craziness made it more fun and memorable. In this story, the Bear family takes a trip to a lakeside cabin in the mountains, yet it’s not the pristine vacation spot the ads made it seem (so I suppose another lesson to be learned is don’t believe everything you read/see!). In the end, the Bear family makes the best of it and discovers that sometimes things really are funnier in hindsight.

Book Review · Books & Reading · Story & Characters

Book Review – “Eragon”


The Story: 
[from GoodReads:]
When Eragon finds a polished blue stone in the forest, he thinks it is the lucky discovery of a poor farm boy; perhaps it will buy his family meat for the winter. But when the stone brings a dragon hatchling, Eragon realizes he has stumbled upon a legacy nearly as old as the Empire itself. Overnight his simple life is shattered, and he is thrust into a perilous new world of destiny, magic, and power. With only an ancient sword and the advice of an old storyteller for guidance, Eragon and the fledgling dragon must navigate the dangerous terrain and dark enemies of an Empire ruled by a king whose evil knows no bounds. Can Eragon take up the mantle of the legendary Dragon Riders? The fate of the Empire may rest in his hands

My Take: I have to start out by giving props to Paolini, who initially drafted this story at age 15. Yes, I’m sure there is a question as to how much outside assistance he had in terms of penning it, but it still begs the question – how many 15-year-olds would even want to sit down and write a novel-sized work? Based on my experience, that answer would be next to none.

That being said, yes, Eragon has its flaws, chiefly in allowing its inspirations to shine through a little too clearly. But I do agree with some reviewers in saying that this does make for a good introductory fantasy work, especially for young readers, as the young protagonist, dragons, magic, and sense of fun adventure seem perfectly in tune to that age group. Hence why I ultimately awarded it three solid stars on GoodReads, which translates to “Liked It,” and, for the most part, I did (and I have a fond memory of watching the film adaptation, too, especially as my Mom enjoyed it and she’s not much of a dragon fan!).

For starters, what I enjoyed most about this novel was the human-dragon relationship. It’s quite common to depict dragons as villainous or vile creatures, so it’s nice to see this reversed where dragons become the heroes. Saphira is, without a doubt, a powerful being and not to be trifled with, but she’s also patient and tries to impart wisdom to young Eragon. Eragon is also a likable protagonist and his relationship with Saphira feels realistic and consumes the best parts of the novel for me. To be honest, it was this dynamic that kept this book from being just okay, hence my three-star rating as opposed to two stars.

Granted, the plot is easy to take but it follows a very traditional destiny/quest structure and doesn’t do much to deviate from that or add anything new. Likewise, most of the characters are tropes: Eragon is the unsuspecting hero; Brom is the “wise old man” or teacher figure; Arya is the female lead/love interest; Durza is the dark villain; and so on. Hence becomes my biggest criticism of this book – its inspirational sources become a bit too apparent. Granted, certain types of stories (such as destiny stories or quest tales) bear hallmarks that are simply conventional; but I can take a slight issue with stories that don’t hide their mechanics, as it were. I had the same trouble with The Magicians and Mrs. Quent by Galen Beckett where the constant hearkening back to similar Gothic romance novels and Regency fiction (namely Jane Eyre and the works of Jane Austen) overshadowed the story.

I say all of this because, for me, Eragon suffers the same fate. It’s no secret that its characters, themes, and plot were inspired by (and perhaps derived from) Beowulf (one character is even named Hrothgar); the works of J.R.R. Tolkien (try saying Eragon and not think of Aragorn – that’s happened many times to me while penning this review!); and even Star Wars. Again, all writers are inspired by other writers and it’s okay to pay an homage. But you can’t allow your work to entirely be an homage (without openly calling it that).

Does that mean Eragon is a rip off? No, I wouldn’t go that far; but many times it reads like a young writer’s tribute to his favorite writers and stories. Again, there isn’t anything inherently wrong with that, but you have to be graceful about it. In her Harry Potter series, J. K. Rowling, for example, pays homage to other writers such as Austen, Lewis, and Dickens, but readers aren’t hit over the head with these references. They’re executed subtly and they’re not on every page. In contrast, Eragon is not subtle and therein lies its greatest flaw and mental stumbling block for older, more seasoned fantasy fans. When compared to other fantasy works, this novel pales in comparison but it is by no means poor. It’s simply a generic, standard fantasy quest story that works but struggles to stand apart from the crowd of similar novels.

Overall, Eragon is a debut novel that reads like a debut novel as well as a debut novel by a young writer. It isn’t terrible and has its shining moments, especially regarding its treatment of dragons, but it borrows too heavily from fantasy conventions and doesn’t try to breath new or unique life into them. That being said, this novel would make a good pick for new fantasy fans, especially among the independent reader set seeking for a big book to sink their teeth into. For everyone else, it’s worth checking out just to admire the work of a young man who decided to use his time creatively and constructively – and that’s more than what I can say for most 15 year olds!

Content:
Language – None (that I can recall); any language potentially used is few and far between and consists of only PG-level words.

Violence – Violence is chiefly contained in the fantasy violence lane where we see human/human and human/dragon action scenes as well as times when magic is used as a weapon. Likewise, there are large-scale battle scenes but there are no moments lingering over blood or gore. As a whole, and based on its size, this book is geared for older children to adults as younger children simply wouldn’t have the patience to follow along.

Sexual Content – None.

The Run-Down:

Overall, Eragon makes for the good first step into fantasy for newbie middle grade readers; however, beyond that I sense it might hold less appeal save for die-hard dragon fans. That being said, it’s not a horrible book by any means but feels weighted down by the less than subtle nods to its own inspirations. However, I feel like I can’t fault it too much for being a debut novel, especially one from a (at the time) young talent. So for young fantasy fans, especially in the middle grade camp, I’d definitely recommend this as a fun adventure tale before directing them to the better crafted stories that actually inspired Eragon.

Book Review · Books & Reading · Story & Characters

Book Review – “The City on the Other Side”


The Story: 
[from GoodReads:]
San Francisco. The great quake of 1906 is still a recent memory.

Sheltered within her high society world, Isabel plays the part of a perfectly proper little girl – she’s quiet, well-behaved, and she keeps her dresses spotlessly clean. She’s certainly not the kind of girl who goes on adventures. But that all changes when Isabel breaches an invisible barrier and steps into another world. She discovers a city not unlike her own, but magical and dangerous. Here, war rages between the fairies of the Seelie and Unseelie Courts. Only Isabel, with the help of a magical necklace and a few new friends, stands a chance of ending the war before it destroys the fairy world – and her own.

My Take: I’m admittedly not the world’s biggest graphic novel fan, but I won’t say no to checking one out if the story sounds interesting, the artwork is well-done, and the content is clean (no graphic violence or sex/nudity). The City on the Other Side checked off each of these boxes, hence why I decided to read it. And, all in all, I found it to be a solidly average but still entertaining read.

For starters, the biggest draw here is the artwork. It’s bright, colorful, and certainly catches the eye. While it’s not intended to be entirely realistic, it shies away from being too cartoony by crafting characters that look like normal people, designing settings with excellent details, and making the plethora of Fae characters come to life.

Here are a few samples of the art (no worries – there are no spoilers!) (Click each picture to enlarge.):



Plot-wise, The City on the Other Side is fairly straightforward. Isabel comes from a well-to-do family but wishes for something more out of life, namely exploring San Fransisco. When she goes to visit her starving artist father out in the country, she stumbles across the veil that conceals the Fae realm of the Seelie and Unseelie Courts from the Human realm. She ends up making a promise to a dying Fae creature and is sent on a quest to locate a missing princess whose return might finally settle a war that has been brewing between the two Fae courts.

According to legend, the Seelie Court are light Fae beings and the Unseelie Court are dark Fae beings. While beings belonging to the Seelie Court seek to do good and even obtain aid from Humans, beings from the Unseelie Court are more apt to engage in dark, mischievous deeds. The artwork here does a great job differentiating between the two courts as, even without any introductions, you can clearly see who the light beings are and who the dark beings are. In general, the Seelie Court characters  incorporate brighter colors, sport friendlier faces, and favor aspects of nature in either their design or garments/accessories. In contrast, the Unseelie Court characters are monstrous (but not scary) in appearance, possess rougher edges in their overall designs, don angry/tough expressions, and sport a more rugged getup. Overall, I enjoyed the design variations and it definitely appealed to me more than the story itself.

Speaking of which, The City on the Other Side feels like it’s strictly tailored for a middle grade audience, which is fine, from its characters, to its plotting, to even its pacing and vocabulary. Seasoned or older fantasy fans searching for a complex story or deep characters will be hard pressed to find either of those here. That’s not to say there’s no entertainment value whatsoever, but everything here feels a touch recycled without much newness injected into it. As stated, Isabel ends up going on a quest to locate a missing princess, becomes the protector of a magical necklace/talisman, and is accompanied by various persons who help her along the way, all of which are quest story hallmarks and there’s not many variations or liberties taken with them.

Some of these said characters include the street urchin Benjie and the lovable, rough-and-tumble Button from the Seelie Court.


Seriously, Button is just the best.

Out of all of the characters, he was my favorite. Granted, he is a bit of a trope but his character works for the story, meshes well with the rest of the cast, and injects a good dose of comedic timing that doesn’t feel forced. He reminded me very much of Toad from the Super Mario Bros. Super Show cartoon that aired back in the day.

Same gutsy bravado. Same short, unassuming little mushroom dude. Come to think of it, Button and Toad are very similar – maybe they’re twins! 😀

That’s not to say the other characters are boring, but Isabel and Benjie, the two leads, are not as three-dimensional as I would have liked. Isabel is the typical girl who wants to break societal/class molds by going on adventures rather than behaving like a polite young lady and not mussing her dress. She is clever, smart, and plucky, but ultimately we’ve seen this sort of character time and again. Benjie is a little more interesting in that he has a hint of mystery connected to him, and I did appreciate his and Isabel’s friendship, but he ultimately struck me as not very memorable. Likewise, it’s obvious that Isabel and Benjie are of Latin/Hispanic and Asian (I believe?) descent, respectively, yet not much is made of their cultural backgrounds other than a few smatterings of Spanish spoken/used between Isabel and her parents. Personally, I think it would have been fun to tie the folklore and mythology unique to Latin/Hispanic and Asian cultures to the Seelie and Unseelie Courts; but no such connections are made, which would have added a helpful degree of world-building depth. Overall, while middle grade readers will probably enjoy the cast and its leads, older readers will be able spot the more predictable elements that sometimes dull an otherwise colorful tale.

I also liked the way some history was incorporated into the story, though I place emphasis on the word some. As stated, the principle setting is 1900s San Fransisco. Initially, I thought the story was going to focus on the city itself while incorporating a magical element. (And, in truth, we do get an interesting connection between the Fae and the great earthquake.) But, again, it’s lacking that extra something special: while San Fransisco is the setting, we surprisingly spend little time there and, honestly, the human setting could have been changed to someplace else and the plot and characters would have fit right in regardless. Hence, the setting is not all that important to the story, which is disappointing.

In the end, The City on the Other Side was an average read and I awarded it three solid stars on GoodReads, which translates to “Liked It,” though I commented that it’s more like 3.5 stars. And that’s honestly how I felt about it – I liked it and had fun reading it! But it’s definitely for middle grade fantasy fans who are just getting their feet wet into the genre. To more seasoned fantasy fans, this story’s only real draw will be its art and some of the creative Fae creatures; otherwise, it’s a touch too predictable and sparse in spots, especially regarding its setting, for older readers to fully enjoy.

Content:
Language – None (that I can recall); any language potentially used is few and far between and consists of only PG-level words.

Violence – Violence is chiefly contained in the fantasy violence lane where characters chiefly use magic to subdue and attack each other and humans, though sometimes weapons such as swords, blades, and arrows are used. It’s revealed that a devastating natural disaster was actually the result of magic. Some of the beings of the Unseelie Court assume monstrous forms, from Spine, a mer-creature who can pass through solid surfaces, to Coscar, a muscular male with antlers and crimson eyes. These and other beings pursue the heroes but are not intentionally drawn to be scary. One Seelie Court character dies and is shown being shot with arrows with minimal blood to depict wounds. Finally, a large part of the story is the war between the Seelie and Unseelie Courts, so there is some talk of spilling blood and cutaways showing non-graphic battle scenes, characters striking or attacking other characters, and talk of a missing princess. However, nothing ever turns gory, graphic, or frightening (at least not for the 8-12 years old middle grade audience). Younger children might find some of the characters and/or tense situations frightening, so I would recommend parents/guardians checking this out beforehand if contemplating giving it to anyone under eight years old.

Sexual Content – None. Isabel befriends Benjie, a human boy, but their relationship is strictly a friendship. Near the novel’s end, two female Fae characters embrace each other and don affectionate gazes, but there isn’t enough to insinuate that their relationship is anything but long-lost friends. Coscar, leader of the Unseelie Court, is depicted as pale, muscular, and shirtless as he dons a cape and trouser-like garments cover him from the waist down; however, he’s not intentionally drawn to be titillating (though his physical appearance might frighten young children – see note in the Violence category above).

The Run-Down:

Overall, The City on the Other Side is a fast-paced, charming, Fae-based fantasy tale. That being said, I sense that seasoned fantasy readers might not find as much appeal here – beyond the artwork – as younger readers or newer fantasy fans. Hence, I think this makes a perfect pick for its target middle grade audience as the artwork is colorful, the characters are likable, the plot is easy to follow, and the content is clean and age-appropriate. That’s not to say older fantasy or graphic novel fans can’t enjoy it but it’s decidedly average – certainly good but definitely not great.

book tags · Books & Reading · Story & Characters

Book Confessions Book Tag

I saw this tag on Keep Reading Forward (see original post here) and thought it sounded like fun, so I decided to give it a try.

It’s (book) confession time, everyone!

You’ve been warned. 😀

Which book did you most recently DNF?

The Casquette Girls by Alys Arden
To be honest, I gave this a good, fair chance to draw me in. The novel opens with an interesting premise as the main character returns to hurricane-torn Louisiana after attending school in France. Then it dives head first into mystery guys/bad boys, forbidden attraction, yada, yada, yada, and a slew of other YA tropes. It became so predictable and contrived that I just had to stop. But at least I liked the cover.

What book is your guilty pleasure?

Disney’s Descendants novels by Melissa de la Cruz

Admittedly, I don’t feel super guilty for reading (and liking) these books and the Descendants movies, but it’s fairly obvious – without telling my age – that I’m not exactly in their chief demographic. That being said, I still think these are fun adventure stories with clever spins on classic Disney characters.

Which book do you love to hate?

Get Married: What Women Can Do to Help it Happen by Candice Watters
*Cue evil laughter* Well, technically, I would say Fifty Shades of Gray, but seeing as I’ve never read that – and nor will I – I’m going to reserve my choice for a book I actually did read. And regrettably so. I covered all of my issues with this book in my lengthy review (which you can read here). But in short, I dislike this book and its message of what I would call relationship legalism where Watters’ chief thesis seems to be that the end result of marriage rests entirely on our shoulders and God is a mildly interested bystander. Granted, she never openly says these things, but that’s the book’s undercurrent. Overall, while her advice to women in their 20s is full of hope and encouragement, her advice to women in their 30s and beyond is more along the lines of “encouraging” you to grit your teeth and accept a state of unwanted lifelong singleness. That’s not helpful; instead, it’s discouraging, dismissive, and disrespectful.

Which book would you throw into the sea?

The End by Lemony Snicket
No doubt, this has to be the worst final novel in a series I have ever read (and hopefully will ever read). This final book in the expansive Series of Unfortunate Events was, to date, the first book I’ve ever read that made me want to literally heave it across the room (but only because I don’t live near an ocean). Talk about a book not only not worth reading in and of itself, but also not worth reading the previous twelve books to get to it. It gives the three lead characters no breaks even though they rightfully deserved some kind of reprieve. I get that the Series of Unfortunate Events was supposed to be tongue-in-cheek depressing but, for me, something has to make up for that. This final novel most certainly did not accomplish that and made me feel like I had eaten a giant box of mildly tolerable cereal only to discover there was no toy at the bottom.

Which book have you read the most?

The Harry Potter series by J.K. Rowling
I tried my best to calculate how many times I’ve read each book since I started perusing the series in 2005. To the best of my mathematical capabilities, I’ve figured that I’ve read Sorcerer’s Stone and Chamber of Secrets 24 times (as I started out with just those two books first); Prisoner of Azkaban, Goblet of Fire, Order of the Phoenix, and Half-Blood Prince 23 times; and Deathly Hallows 21 times. Therefore, I’ve read the series in its entirety over 20 times. So, yes, I am an official Potter-head and proud of it! 😀

Which book would you hate to receive as a present?

Anything in the realm of erotica. I like any romance in the books I read to be driven by love and respect, not lust, cheapened sex, and anything goes. No thanks.

Which book could you not live without?

I have many favorites – can I just list them all? 😀 Hands down, I would be lost in a literary sense without the Harry Potter series, The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien, The Mysterious Benedict Society by Trenton Lee Stewart, Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte, The War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells, the Lunar Chronicles series by Marissa Meyer, the Fablehaven series by Brandon Mull, The Guardians of Childhood series by William Joyce, A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens, and many others.

Which book made you the angriest?

Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn
In short, I hated this book and the characters made me feel like doing this:

The characters are reprehensible, the writing tries too hard to be literary, and the mystery element has no rhyme or reason for why characters do what they do. Furthermore, there are no heroes here, not even antiheroes, and no underlying sense of hope, forgiveness, redemption, or just plain ol’ common sense. Characters commit horrible acts and never face the consequences. Combine that with language and sex scenes befitting a trashy grocery store checkout line paperback and you’ve got one book that I simply could not get invested in on any level. Truly a waste of time and money if ever there was one.

Which book made you cry the most?

Love You Forever
by Robert Munsch

True confession time – I’m not a crier. It’s not that I have a heart of stone, it’s just that not many things move me to tears and/or tears aren’t my go-to reaction. If something does move me to tears, then it was – for me – truly impactful and touching. This book I remember my mom and I checked out of the library when I was little. While I didn’t cry then, I can now because the central poem in the book is a simple but touching declaration of love, not to mention the caregiver/cared-for roles end up getting reversed. Out of all the books I had read to me as a child, this one definitely stands out.

Which book cover do you hate the most?

Breaking Dawn by Stephenie Meyer
I try not to be too picky when comes it cover art because it is, after all, art, which is subjective. However, what I look for in a good cover is one that is tasteful and fits the story and its world, tone, and characters, whether that includes symbolism or not. But covers that go off into the proverbial left field and try to be too deep or clever earn no points from me. That being said, my least favorite cover art would have to be the chess-inspired image for Breaking Dawn. Not only does this image not make much sense in terms of its chess imagery in relation to the story itself, it also has nothing to do with the setting, characters, or anything else other than it retains the same black, white, and red motif from the previous three covers of the Twilight series.

I know the “formal” explanation is that the white queen is Bella, who finally comes into her own (whatever that means) in this novel . But a chess image? In chess, the queen is the most powerful piece because she can move in any direction (rank, file, or diagonally) and can capture any single opponent piece in her way; but she’s not the most valuable piece (that would be the king). The red chess piece in the background is a pawn, the least valuable piece in that it is the most restricted in mobility and ability to capture (pawns can move one or two squares to start, then one square after that and can only attack on the forward diagonal).

Thus, when I try to apply the symbolism here to the characters, I feel befuddled. I get that Bella, as the lead, becomes powerful thanks to her transformation. I get that she becomes less of a protected character and more of a protector. But there’s the underlying aspect that the queen is not the most valuable piece, so does that mean that while Bella is powerful she’s somehow lacking in value? And who, or what, is the pawn? The pawn is red (rather than white), meaning it’s an opponent’s piece, so I presume this represents someone not aligned with Bella. But who could that be? If that’s meant to stand for Jacob, that’s kind of cold to call him a pawn as it implies he’s weak and expendable (though Bella did play him early on). If it’s the Volturi, I’m not sure they qualify as weak or expendable (though their inclusion here is certainly disposable). If the image is symbolic of Bella’s old life, that could work as she’s certainly in opposition to it now and she did cast it aside. But again, why a pawn? How does that symbolize her old life? Did Bella view herself as a pawn before, as in weak and powerless? Not to mention the queen here isn’t in an immediate position to capture the pawn, so this isn’t intended to be an image of combat. Furthermore, pawns can be promoted to the status of rook, knight, bishop, or queen if you can get them across the board to the opponent’s side. So is that what this elusive pawn is trying to do, get across the board and past Queen Bella so it can be promoted to a more powerful status?

Oooh – my head hurts.
facepalm head hurts ugh no
Okay, I’m dropping this now. Makes me want to go play chess though.

Commentary · Publications

“Escaping the Grip of Grooming” – New Two-Part Article on Rivulet Collective

I recently penned an article for Rivulet Collective, an online Christian “magazine.” Below is a brief excerpt from each part (as this is a two-part article) followed by a link to each full article:

Part One:

George* was an unassuming, 40-something divorcé who worked from home and had a teenage daughter. He enjoyed reading and writing, he seemed friendly and polite, and he claimed to be a Christian. I was nearing 30 at the time and I too loved to read and write. So when George and I met in a creative writing class I led, I was enamored, despite the age gap.

Ours remained a casual friendship for nearly two years. We met nearly every Saturday for lunch at a restaurant to talk and share our writings and were also involved in a book club and writers’ group. Red flags slowly emerged, but initially I chose to ignore or make excuses for them.

Then one day during lunch, George started quizzing me about sex. That’s when I knew.

I was being groomed….

To read the rest of part one, go to: https://www.rivuletcollective.com/rivulet/escaping-the-grip-of-grooming-part-1

Part Two:

[T]he abuser’s goal is to take advantage of you and have you become desensitized to sexual conversation and normalize bad behavior. This starts in small ways, such as jokes or passing remarks. It may move on to getting you interested in pornography or initiating physical advances. Desensitization is a diminished emotional response to negative stimuli – the more an abuser exposes you to sexual content, the more you become numb to it. This may lead to normalization, which is when you begin to see things originally believed to be disagreeable, even morally wrong, as now acceptable….

To read the rest of part one, go to: https://www.rivuletcollective.com/rivulet/escaping-the-grip-of-grooming-part-2

Books & Reading · Commentary

Oh My Stars! – Rating Books on GoodReads


If you’re on GoodReads, you’ve probably used their star system to rate books. For some users, stars are a precursor to a review while others only give star ratings. I do both though I’m more apt to just grant a star rating unless I have strong opinions or praise I want to share about a particular book.

Currently, GoodReads lets users allot up to five whole stars (not half stars), which correspond to one of five descriptions:
Five stars = “It was amazing.”
Four stars = “Really liked it.”
Three stars = “Liked it.”
Two stars = “It was okay.”
One star = “Did not like it.”

Users also have the option of awarding no stars though there is no given description (e.g. zero stars = “really hated it”).

Granted, star ratings are just as subjective as readers’ thoughts on a book, and some readers’ thoughts don’t necessarily correspond with the generic descriptions GoodReads attaches to its stars. For some folks, three stars might be an honestly good read while others would consider a three-star read merely average.

Naturally, there are no “rules” for rating books, but it can be tempting to award a rating based on what other GoodReads users give. But always rate a book based on your feelings, regardless whether others agree. If you feel a low-rated book was actually good, then rate it high. If you disliked a book that is garnering high ratings, then share why you didn’t care for it. Some people don’t want to rock the proverbial boat by presenting unpopular opinions, but potential readers may want to know about an alternative view.

I read four and five star reviews, but I’ll also look for reviews accompanying low ratings because I’m curious to see if (a). anyone didn’t care for the book or harbored ambivalent feelings towards it or (b). there were issues that caused some readers to rate the book low. I might have some of the same issues, so seeing a low rating accompanied by a review explaining why might cause me to not bother checking out the book, thus saving me time and money.

So how do I award stars? Below are how I define the stars I give on GoodReads along with examples of books I’ve rated:


Five Stars = Loved it!
If I award a book five stars, that means I thoroughly enjoyed it and it rightfully belongs on my favorite reads shelf. I found no flaws in the story, its characters, tone, delivery, and themes. In short, this is a book I would highly recommend without thinking twice.

Examples of Five Star Reads: The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien, The Mysterious Benedict Society trilogy by Trenton Lee Stewart, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. Rowling, and Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte.


Four Stars = Very good – but not quite five stars
I’m admittedly very stingy with my stars, so a four-star read for me can still be great – and usually is – but there was just that little something extra it was missing that kept it from being five stars. So in the words of Get Smart‘s Maxwell Smart, it’s a book that…

Examples of Four Star Reads: Scarlet by Marissa Meyer, Fish in a Tree by Linda Mullaly Hunt, Mockingjay by Suzanne Collins, and The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd


Three Stars = Solidly good, neither great nor terrible.
For me, three stars means solidly average. I reserve this rating for books that are genuinely good but more middle of the road than four-star reads. Hence, three star books are like a bowl of Corn Flakes – nothing dreadful but definitely not a favorite.

Examples of Three Star Reads: The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern, Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie, The Golden Compass by Phillip Pullman, and A Suitable Boy by Vikram Seth


Two Stars = So-so/just okay.
Two star reads can go one of two ways with me – they can either be a fairly average read that just didn’t capture my attention or they were all-around so-so and borderline meh. Regarding the first category, there was probably nothing wrong with the story itself, but I either wasn’t investing interest or was not the intended audience. In the other category, there might be issues I had with the book and, as such, didn’t enjoy it but not enough to say I disliked it.

Examples of Two Star Reads: Nineteen Minutes by Jodi Picoult, New Moon by Stephenie Meyer, Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, and Emma by Jane Austen.


One Star = Not a book I would read again (provided I finished it)
If I rate a book one star, then it was something I didn’t enjoy at all, might not have finished, became bored by, or took too many issues with it. Maybe there was some slight or random redeeming factor, hence the single star, but everything else – plot, themes, characters, and/or content – were not my cup of tea and not anything I care to remember or revisit.

Examples of One Star Reads: Spindle Fire by Lexa Hillyer, A Game of Thrones by George R. R. Martin, Gunslinger Girl by Lyndsay Ely, and The Winter of Our Discontent by John Steinbeck


Zero stars = Not only would I never read this again, I can’t recommend it.
I don’t have too many books on my GoodReads shelf that were awarded no stars but there are a few. In these cases, I had so many issues with the book that I didn’t feel it deserved any stars. These are books I can honestly say I hated, whatever the reason, which can range from a dark, dreadful story; to explicit content; to complete disagreement with the author’s views.

Examples of Zero Star Reads: Hunted by Meagan Spooner (for feminist themes), Gone Girl by Gillian Flynn (for a dark story with no redeeming value), I am Her Revenge by Meredith Moore (for violence against animals), and Get Married: What Women Can Do to Help it Happen by Candice Watters (for promoting legalism and age-shaming)

Commentary · Media

Musical Musings – Gorillaz


Aside from being a writer, I’m also an avid music listener. However, I’m just as picky about my music as I am with my books! I still buy CDs but only if they’re from a favorite artist, and my list of favorites is small (for now, it consists of only five: Blur, Paramore, Coldplay, Florence + the Machine, and the band I’m going to discuss at length below) though I download quite a bit of music from iTunes.

However, it seems to me like the quality of popular music is declining as it’s less concerned about creativity and more focused on cookie cutter arrangements and vocals. I’m not here to hate on pop music nor am I a crusty old soul who can’t stand what “the kids these days” are listening to. However, I will always gravitate towards musicians and bands who take the time to create art instead of just generating the next big thing.

Gorillaz is one such band.

Despite being entirely fictional. But I’ll get to that in a moment. 😉

Seeing as Gorillaz recently released their latest full-length project, The Now Now, the time is right to dish on my favorite band.

I was first introduced to Gorillaz unawares back in 2000. I was watching “BattleBots” on Comedy Central and saw an ad for what was their debut, self-titled album. The ad featured snippets from the music video for “Clint Eastwood,” but at the time, I had no idea what I was watching. I just thought it was a commercial for a new mature cartoon show until I realized it was for a CD. It was weird. It was dark. And I all but completely forgot about it.

Until 2005.

I was in college, listening to my car radio on the way home from classes, when I heard the most intriguing song I had heard in the longest time. In terms of my musical tastes up to that point, I mainly listened to music from the 60s, 70s, and 80s and contemporary Christian music. Throughout the 90s, I listened to Christian music almost exclusively because there was a lot to choose from genre-wise. Some of my favorite artists were dc Talk, Jars of Clay, Plumb, and the Newsboys. However, over the years, a lot of the artists I listened to either went on hiatus or ceased to do music altogether, so I felt like I was running out of new music to explore. As the 2000s approached, the wide range of Christian rock, alternative, pop, and rap that I enjoyed was slowly replaced by generic praise and worship songs that, while usually lyrically passable, lacked the sense of creativity and lyrical depth I was craving.

(I want to add that I don’t hate Christian music. I am a Christian myself and I still listen to artists I enjoyed back when I was a teen. Those songs spoke to me then and still speak to me today. So this isn’t a story about how I “graduated” from Christian music to “secular” music. I listen to and love music across a spectrum of musicians, genres, and time periods. I also believe that all truth is ultimately God’s truth, whether it’s sung by an openly Christian artist, an artist with no religious affiliation, or even a virtual band!)

Seeking more variety in my music, I turned to the radio. For years, I mainly listened to a local oldies station and a Christian station that eventually became just a talk show line up. But when I went to college and commuted, I decided to explore other stations. I first tried another local Christian station, but it was dominated by worship music that all sounded alike to me after a while. So I switched to a local pop station and discovered the likes of Michelle Branch, Vanessa Carlton, Pink, Linkin Park, Lenny Kravitz, Evanescence, and Avril Lavigne. While I won’t say everything they put out was/is good, some of their songs were interesting and, at the very least, catchy. I also discovered Coldplay and instantly fell in love their sound and lyrics, and I’m a big fan to this day.

But there was one band that stood head and shoulders above the rest.

So in the fall of 2005, I heard a song that was unlike anything else on the radio. My local pop station played a wide variety of genres at the time (as opposed to the pre-fab pop and rap they spin now), but even then this track stood out. The music was truly undefined as it bore hallmarks of pop, alternative, hip-hop/rap, and electronic. It was a cool fusion of styles that blended harmoniously and made it distinctive. Similarly, the song had interesting lyrics that allowed the listener to derive their own meaning from the curious word play and pictures:


Windmill, windmill for the land.

Turn forever hand in hand
Take it all in on your stride
It is sinking, falling down
Love forever, love is free
Let’s turn forever, you and me
Windmill, windmill for the land
Is everybody in?

I kept listening, hoping to find out who the artist was. Finally, at the end of the song, the DJ announced, “That was ‘Feel Good Inc.’ by Gorillaz.”

Gorillaz. The name sounded familiar but at the time I couldn’t place it. All I knew was I had to look this group up and check out more of their music.

It didn’t take long for me to realize that this was the same band I had seen the commercial for years ago. But now I was intrigued. I snatched up their newest album at the time, Demon Days, and listened to it from beginning to end without stopping. I felt like I was immersed in a musical experience as opposed to just listening to a batch of songs. The album was like a novel put to music where each song was a chapter and told a story. It quickly became a favorite and much-played album of mine and still is to this day.

Naturally, I went on the hunt to obtain the rest of the Gorillaz discography as well as learn more about this strange little band, which technically is a virtual band (read: animated) consisting of vocalist 2D, lead guitarist Noodle, drummer Russel Hobbs, and bass guitarist Murdoc Niccals. But while these characters don’t exist in real life, the musicians and collaborators behind them are real.


Gorillaz is the brainchild of Blur front man Damon Albarn and “Tank Girl” comic creator Jamie Hewlett. These two masterminds started work on their virtual creation back in 1998 and did so partly to poke fun at the state of pop music. It’s no surprise that I’m also a huge Blur fan and I own all of their major albums and then some. I don’t agree with Albarn on his political views, but I admire him as a consummate performer, musician, and songwriter. Just as Blur doesn’t offer mindless fluffy pop songs but presents meat on their musical bones, so Gorillaz delivers the same through a myriad of genres. Gorillaz maintains a mixture of dark humor and dingy tones buried beneath a cheeky exterior, and this style can be evidenced not only in their music and lyrics but also in their videos.

I delved into the band’s history, both the real-life background of their creation and the biographies of the various members (and I’m a proud owner of their fictional autobiography, Rise of the Ogre). I found it all to be a fascinating musical and cultural experiment that has obviously proven successful. The basic premise of Gorillaz is that it ridicules how music is fabricated while, in turn, serving as the ultimate fabrication. Many musical acts seem pre-packaged, ready to consume without much thought. Gorillaz takes this one step further by being entirely concocted yet offering thought-provoking lyrics that encourage analysis.

It’s not too hard to determine that the Gorillaz themselves (the virtual band members, that is) are intended to be caricatures. Murdoc is the egotistical, narcissistic, womanizing rock god; Noodle is the child prodigy; Russel is the low-key, tormented old soul; and 2D is the pretty boy talented singer with a tragic past. I imagine it would have been tempting to make these characters cartoony and kid-friendly. Instead, each one has an elaborately bizarre backstory, making them unique and decidedly mature.


Out of the line up, I like Murdoc the best because he’s the epitome of the ultimate rock star/god in caricature form. He’s christened himself the leader of Gorillaz (as he, technically, is the founder). He believes he’s the most talented musician of the lot despite only playing the bass. He’s touted that he’s a better singer than 2D (Murdoc is tone deaf at least when it comes to singing). He’s a megalomaniac Svengali (so it makes sense that he’s a Satanist) with a razor sharp wit. And he firmly believes he’s desirable to all women despite being less than handsome. Thus, Murdoc represents everything the general public believes about alpha male rock musicians though he is grossly exaggerated for comedic effect, the humor being that despite his grand claims, it’s obvious that Murdoc is no where near being as marvelous as he makes himself sound.

For the record, while Gorillaz doesn’t create offensive music, their image is steeped in dark humor and some of their songs tout a profanity here and there and can touch on saturnine themes, from drug abuse (“Sleeping Powder”), to violence in popular media (“Kids with Guns”), to loneliness (“El Manana” and “On Melancholy Hill”), to even imperialism as a metaphor (“Fire Coming Out of a Monkey’s Head”). Hence, there is more to their songs than meets the ear, which is something I deeply appreciate. Gorillaz’s music is adult but not dirty, poetic but not pretentious, introspective but not mopey or depressing. Nearly every song gives the listener something to consider or imagine, and I love music you have to think about as opposed to earworm-inducing tunes. It’s obvious Albarn and the other Gorillaz song writers take time to make musical art when it comes to Gorillaz.

Jamie Hewlett, too, obviously cares enough about these characters to not present boiler plate animated figures. Much like their sound, Gorillaz retains a mature, darkly comical look rather than be a cast of bright, shiny, colorful cartoons. Hewlett doesn’t try to realistically capture his characters or their surroundings but that’s okay. His renderings mirror the underlying irony of Gorillaz – these characters live in a world that’s not as pretty as it seems despite the seemingly colorful, superficial charm.

Another facet that makes Gorillaz unique is the level of interactivity fans have with the band through various media platforms. Their website (when it showcased the now defunct Kong Studios) was fully interactive, allowing fans to navigate the studio level by level, room by room, complete with videos to watch, tracks to listen to, games to play, and a plethora of strange sights to explore, from the murky kitchen to Murdoc’s crusty Winnebago. The website even earned a Webby Award for its design and interactive content that perfectly represented and encapsulated the Gorillaz brand. Likewise, the band members all have social media accounts (the most “vocal” of whom is – no surprise – Murdoc, who has an active Twitter account). All of this adds to the sense of realism the band’s creators strive to generate around their characters.

Likewise, each major album marks a new “phase” for the band, and, as such, the band’s members change just like real people. Each of the Gorillaz’s members has a birthday and are allowed to age accordingly. At the time of the debut album’s release, 2D was 23 years old, Murdoc was 35, Noodle was 11, and Russel was 26. While their principal designs don’t change much, they’re drawn to reflect their chronological age as time goes on as you can see below through the different phases’ artwork:

Phrase One: Gorillaz (2001)

Phase Two: Demon Days (2005)

Phase Three: Plastic Beach (2010)

Phase Four: Humanz (2017)

Phase Five: The Now Now (2018)

(*Note: Murdoc is noticeably absent from the band’s line up here as, according to the character’s current backstory, he’s serving time in prison. In his place as bassist is Ace, a character borrowed from The Powerpuff Girls.)

Therefore, if you do the math, the band members have aged about 17 years: 2D is now 40 years old, Murdoc is 52, Noodle is 28, and Russel is 43. This adds a layer of attention and creativity that shows that Albarn, Hewlett, and Co. care about making not only good music and visuals but also compelling characters and stories. It would have been easy to create stock characters and give them unchanging designs and a simple backstory. But rather than keep the members of Gorillaz static or condensed, the band’s creators let them age, evolve, adopt their own senses of style, and make their own choices so they seem like real people.

My musical musings wouldn’t be complete without ranking Gorillaz’s major albums and compilations. So here they are below:


8. Laika Comes Home (2002) – This is a rare album and I was shocked I found it at my small local music store. While not my favorite (I’ve only ever listened to this once), it is an interesting musical experiment where the entire Gorillaz debut album is remixed and re-imagined as reggae tracks.


7. The Fall
(2010) – Again, this one isn’t a favorite, but I respect its composition process as it was recorded entirely on an iPad app. There are no vocal tracks (otherwise it would have ranked higher), but it’s still a fun listening experience.


6. G Sides (2002) and D-Sides (2007)
– I decided to combine these two compilation albums. Noteworthy tracks and remixes include “19-2000 (Soulchild Remix)” and “Faust” (from G-Sides) and “Dirty Harry (Schtung Chinese New Year Remix)” (“Dirty Harry” sung entirely in Chinese!), “People” (which eventually became “Dare”), and “68 State” (from D-Sides).


5. Gorillaz (2001)
– Their debut album is chocked full of memorable tracks that present a good range of the styles the band has tackled, from alternative, to pop, to hip hop, to electronic. Standout tracks include “Clint Eastwood,” “19-2000,” and “Tomorrow Comes Today.”


4. The Now Now (2018) – Gorillaz’s latest full-length album is a brighter, more upbeat and scaled back (in terms of collaborations) offering than Humanz. Similarly, this album serves as more of a collection of songs rather than possessing an overall concept, thus serving as a fun call-back to their debut album in this regard. Standout tracks would be “Humility,” “Sorcererz,” and “Idaho.”


3. Humanz (2017)
– This album is a bit darker in tone (redolent of the Demon Days era only with less cheekiness at times) when compared to its predecessor, Plastic Beach, as well as its bubbly follow up, The Now Now. Not to mention it’s filled to the brim with collaborators, which exemplifies Gorillaz’s noteworthy genre fluidity. Standout tracks include the eerie lead single “Saturn Barz,” the infectiously catchy “Strobelight,” and the somber “Busted and Blue.”


2. Plastic Beach (2010)
– This album retained the album-as-story vibe akin to Demon Days as it’s more of a concept album than a collection of songs. Its prevailing themes are isolation and conservation of one’s external and internal environment, and most of the songs approach these topics in a variety of ways, from somber introspectivity (“On Melancholy Hill”) to cheeky sarcasm (“Superfast Jellyfish”). Standout tracks include “Rhinestone Eyes,” “Stylo,” “Empire Ants,” “On Melancholy Hill,” and “Broken.”


1. Demon Days (2005) – This remains my all-time favorite album and has yet to be unseated. This album, much like Plastic Beach, is a concept album rather than a random mix of songs. Here, the overall themes are change, loneliness, and isolation that ultimately end on a positive note. Much like trying to navigate through a dense fog, the final track, “Demon Days,” brings you into the light of day as it encourages listeners to Pick yourself up/it’s a brand new day/so turn yourself ’round…into the sun. Hence, the album comes full circle, opening with the morose “Last Living Souls” that wonders if there’s any hope left for mankind and ends on an uplifting note. It’s a musical masterpiece and I love it! Standout tracks certainly include “Feel Good Inc.,” “Dare,” “El Manana,” “Every Planet We Reach is Dead,” “Demon Days,” “November Has Come,” and “Dirty Harry.”

In closing, it’s rare for me to become a fan of really anything, from movies to television and books to music. But when it comes to Gorillaz, I make it a point to buy every album, download every remix and single, watch every video, and check out any related media. So, yes, it’s safe to call me a die-hard fan and I won’t mind a bit! 😀 But their music and level of artistry – even if it is all done behind the scenes by real-life artists and musicians – certainly deserves the attention

So if you’re starving for some music that’s more than just catchy hooks and mindless lyrics, then give Gorillaz a try. There’s something for everyone and you just might find yourself a new favorite band, too.

It’s just a shame Gorillaz don’t exist as real people.

Though if they actually did exist, they’d be some very strange folks indeed!