Media · Story & Characters

“Gotham” – Episode Four (S2) Review

gotham_header_h_2015 season two banner
Strike Force
**Spoilers Throughout**
What a tangled web the “Gotham” writers weave! Let’s dive right in, shall we?

For starters, let’s take a look at the changes for the GCPD, which are sure to have their fair share of ramifications. This episode introduces us to Captain Barnes, played by Michael Chiklis (who is probably most known for his work on The Shield, so he seems right at home here). While I like his character and his no-nonsense attitude, I fear he will become the tough cop trope. I did admire his character’s purging of the GCPD though as his sentiments echo the ideas of Aristotle who taught that it’s okay to get angry. In fact, there are situations where righteous anger is necessary, and Barnes identifies that here. He shames the officers, telling them that anyone who isn’t embarrassed and angry about the Maniax’s attack on the GCPD should resign. One thing I will say – he’s no sissy and that’s always an admirable trait in a character.

To help clean up the city and the GCPD, Barnes decides to assemble a strike force of four fresh-faced police academy cadets. He selects young people on purpose because they are full of “faith and hope in the system” and haven’t been corrupted by outside influences or cynicism. The fact he places Jim Gordon in charge over them is a smart move. Looking a little more deeply into it, four is a number rife with symbolism and is most commonly tied to the four elements (i.e. earth, wind, water, and fire). If you count Jim among their number, that brings the total to five; and in keeping with the element connection here, five is seen as the “number” for spirit, the binding agent that keeps the elements, which are seen as in conflict, in line. It is way too early to tell whether or not these recruits will branch out and become less than background cast, but it’s easy to see how Jim will be the moral glue to bind them together – provided these aren’t just “red shirts” slated to be killed off in the weeks to come.

Some bad signs to me of this already are:
a). They don’t appear to be canon characters and
b). Do you even remember their names? I don’t.

So all signs, for me, point to…
redshirts bad news not good star trek
But time will tell.

However, as good as Barnes’ intentions are, they possess one flaw. His aggressive nature, tactics, and mentality are all focused on justice and judgment. That’s good and there is nothing wrong with that. “Crime unpunished is a crime in and of itself,” he asserts, which is certainly true. Yet his philosophy seems devoid of forgiveness or mercy. Just as believing that you won’t be held accountable and judged for your actions is a bad thing, so is believing that people don’t deserve mercy.Ā  Jim Gordon has proven he can be merciful, so I wonder if he isn’t being set up as a contrast to Barnes’ hell-fire and brimstone mentality. Again, justice and judgment for wrongdoing are necessary, but so is forgiveness and the willingness to extend a second chance. For example, rather than allowing the corrupted officers Barnes calls out to be given a chance to redeem themselves or ask for forgiveness, he kicks them to the curb. Was it the right move? Perhaps. But I sense the chink in Barnes’ armor will be this lack of compassion, so his parallel to Jim will be an interesting one.

Ed on Date
In other news in this episode, Ed Nygma finally gets the nerve to ask Kristen out with a little coaxing from Gollum-Ed (that’s my term for his “dark side.” If you don’t know what I’m talking about, just check out my review of episode two.). Gollum-Ed insists that Kristen owes Ed because he saved her life and urges Ed to take what he “deserves.” If this hasn’t been evident before, it is now: Gollum-Ed is Ed’s sinful self or his Id, if we were to evoke Freud. Deep down, Ed feels life is just about him yet his timid nature does him a favor by keeping this cocky side in check. I sense Ed doesn’t really want to act like a self-centered jerk, which is what Gollum-Ed is proposing, yet behaving opposite of what he has been all this time seems appealing.

It’s like the Seinfeld episode “The Opposite” where George decides to do everything contrary to what he’s done before. “If every instinct you have is wrong, then the opposite would have to be right,” Jerry tells him. So George decides to give it a go: he openly approaches women, proudly admits he’s unemployed and lives with his parents, calls attention to his baldness, and even chews out a prospective employer. And every time he does the opposite, it seems to work.

I have always sensed this has been Ed’s inner dialogue with himself (normal Ed, not Gollum-Ed):
seinfeld george opposite
Ed wants to be liked by his co-workers, seen as a valued member of the GCPD, and doted on by Kristen. However, his life is the opposite of these hopes and dreams: his co-workers think he’s weird, he’s underappreciated, and Kristen holds him at arm’s length. So with Ed buying into what Gollum-Ed is telling him, he is behaving like George and doing the opposite of his natural inclinations. While in George’s case this was strictly for comedy (because we all know George was doomed to fail due to his self-defeating mindset), Ed’s continuation with this philosophy will have grave consequences, both for himself and for Kristen and others. So we’ll see what happens as this inner battle continues.

At last, Kristen agrees to go out with Ed and the two enjoy dinner at Ed’s place which is nicely illuminated by a very Riddler green-tinted lighting (props to that!). Things turn slightly sour when Ed lets it drop that he’s glad Kristen’s abusive beau is dead, which seems to trigger suspicion from Kristen as she assumed the jerk simply skipped town. Ed tries to cover for his slip but it seems too late. Later, Ed apologizes and confesses, “I have this voice inside my head. A sort of stronger version of me that keeps me in line because I’m such a klutz.”

After this revelation, Kristen admits she understands. “I think we all have a voice like that,” she says. True enough – we all have voices that pull us in sundry directions. Not literal voices or manifestations (as in Ed’s case) but urges and nudges that tell us to go right, go left, etc. Some of the stuff we hear in our heads is good, some is morally neutral, and some is not so good, or, at the very least, negative. Ed is wise enough to recognize there is another force within him at work, which is better than denial. But he seems to relish it because it gives him a license to behave in the opposite fashion. Since we all know he’s the future Riddler, time will tell when he makes that final step into villainy. But one thing is certain – he’s well on his way.

Someone who has already grasped the reigns of villainy and refuses to let go is Theo Galavan. While he’s not one of my favorite characters this season, his over-the-top mentality and desire to play the “hero” are entertaining because they’re built on a shaky, dualistic foundation. In his mind, to be a good guy you have to do bad things. To clean up a mess, you first have to make one. And in order to rebuild Gotham, he first must destroy, not merely buildings but lives. And he wishes for Penguin to be his “destroyer,” but Penguin, to his credit, insists that’s not his M.O. – he’s a “builder, a problem-solver,” meaning he approaches his villainy like a businessman – calculated, precise, and controlled. Sadly, Galavan doesn’t share his sentiments and reveals his next step in reclaiming Gotham – becoming mayor. This, for me, relegates Galavan to being a near-trope villain: he’s “mad, bad, and dangerous to know,” but why? What pushed him over the edge? We might get answers later on, but for now he’s at the back of the bad guy pack for me. Trope characters have their place, which usually is not at the front of the line, as they’re not intended to be interesting. This has been my concern with Galavan and now Barnes – they have their unique signatures, but beneath the surface there doesn’t seem to be much to explore. That could change though, as it so often does in Gotham.

To clear his path to candidacy, Galavan all but orders Penguin to eliminate two current candidates plus take a shot at him to make it not look staged. Penguin wouldn’t have obliged him on that alone as I think Oswald has a good sense of who is legit and who is a poser. Legit criminals, businessmen, and the like he can stomach and he’ll work with to achieve his own aims. But posers just waste his time. Galavan’s plan to become Gotham’s “savior” (term used loosely) is, as stated, to be the one and only candidate for mayor. Not wanting to leave anything to chance though, he enlists Penguin’s help. Not by asking politely, mind you, but by kidnapping Gertrude, Oswald’s mother. If there is anything Penguin holds near and dear to his heart, it’s his mother, whom I’ve always seen as his Achilles’ heel and I wondered when someone would try to use her to gain leverage over him. Galavan’s bargain is simple – help him clear the field and he’ll let Mama Penguin go.

In truth, Penguin does what anyone in a situation like that would do – he acts under duress and partially succeeds. But he knows that won’t be enough. His unbridled scream at the episode’s end was the perfect way to cap this episode. One thing you can say for Penguin – he is not a cardboard cutout character. He’s multi-faceted: cocky when he needs to be, compliant when the situation calls for it, but always with an aim for control. To see him emotionally vulnerable makes him stand out among Gotham’s baddies. While Gertrude’s fate remains vague for now, it’s easy to see that Penguin is upset with himself that he’s failed and is equally enraged at Galavan. After cutting himself free from being an underling, Oswald doesn’t relish the thought of going into that role again. He doesn’t like being seen as weak, but the fact he failed to save his mother (at least this time) proves he’s not infallible. One can only imagine what he has in store for the Galavans and how he’ll play these conniving twins.

Personally, I hope it looks a little something like this…
bart-getting-choked ugh upset
‘Cause the Galavans deserve what’s (hopefully) coming to them. Nobody messes with Mama Penguin, you sick thugs!

Oddly enough, Penguin is the only principle cast member to be given scenes where he interacts with or even has a parent who’s a part of his on-screen life. (Barbara’s quick scenes with her folks in season one notwithstanding.) Granted, Bruce and Alfred could be counted as a family unit, but Alfred is presented as a paternal figure, not a fill-in father. Thus, the “Gotham” cast is a bit like a Disney movie – mom and/or dad are dead. So why does Penguin get singled out? It might be for nothing else but to add another layer to his character: having a loved one present softens his edges, so to speak, and makes him more human. And if there is one thing I like to see in my villains, it’s a weak spot – not to be exploited but to remind us that they’re not entirely evil.

As stated before, Gertrude, his one and only true ally (excluding Jim Gordon), is the only person who loves Oswald unconditionally. Yes, Oswald has kept the truth from his mother in an effort to retain her love and protect her from the dangers he dabbles in (though I doubt she thinks he’s just a nightclub owner now!). But all in all, she means the world to him. Penguin might have been speaking prophetically towards another character in season one when he asserted that what a man loves becomes his greatest weakness. Or perhaps it’s been better stated as, “where your treasure is, there your heart will be also” (Matthew 6:21). In other words, what you value the most is what your care and concern will be focused on. In Oswald’s case, he loves power, but he’s willing to put that aside for the sake of protecting his mother. Hence, he loves his mother more than he loves to be in control, meaning she is his heart’s treasure.

Even when he’s drenching his hands in blood, his mother’s safety is what motivates him. When one of the candidates pleads for her life, saying she’s a mother, Oswald gives pause, as if seriously considering what he’s about to do. But he makes his choice and tells her that he, too, has a mother, before stabbing the candidate. Hence, it’s his love for his mother than causes him to choose, not the fact he has the power to take a life or not. All in all, this episode contains highlights of Taylor’s fine acting and I can’t wait to see what he does next. In the end, the aftermath of this episode will prove most interesting, as well as thorny.

Just one last thing, though, Captain Barnes –
leave penguin alone

Until next time, fellow Gothamites! šŸ™‚


3 thoughts on ““Gotham” – Episode Four (S2) Review

    1. I was nervous for this second season as I have seen many shows suffer from the “sophomore slump,” but I like the story format better this time around (as opposed to the first season’s crime-of-the-week type of plotting). I’m always eager to see what’s coming next. I do hope Maggie likes “Gotham,” too! šŸ˜€

      By the way, I wish you the best of success for your book (I’ve been following your posts). I hope you can find a publisher as there is definitely a market out there for the book you want to write. The trick is patience and perseverance, both of which can be hard to do. Some writers have had to shop around for years until they find the right publisher. It takes time but it eventually works out!

      Thanks for commenting and have a great day! šŸ™‚

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s